ETF COMPARISON

SPUS vs HLAL: how the two halal ETFs differ

SPUS and HLAL both offer Shariah-screened US equity exposure, but they come from different providers and follow different indexes. SPUS tracks the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index from SP Funds, while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index from Wahed. Their expense ratios, inception dates, screening attribution and distribution policies all differ, so the right choice depends on which index and provider you prefer — neither is presented here as a winner.

SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETFSharia-compliant exposure to low-leverage stocks drawn from the S&P 500 IndexOfficial fund page →
HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETFPassive, index-tracking exposure to US Shariah-compliant large- and mid-cap equities across 16 ICB sectorsOfficial fund page →
SPUSHLAL
ProviderSP FundsWahed
ObjectiveSharia-compliant exposure to low-leverage stocks drawn from the S&P 500 IndexPassive, index-tracking exposure to US Shariah-compliant large- and mid-cap equities across 16 ICB sectors
BenchmarkS&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions IndexFTSE Shariah USA Index
Index administratorS&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P GlobalFTSE International Limited
Screening attributionThe index is owned and administered by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and was co-developed in 2019 with the fund's sub-adviser, ShariaPortfolio, Inc. Raqaba LLC is appointed as Sharia adviser to ShariaPortfolio and provides its services in accordance with AAOIFI and IFSB standards. The Sharia adviser is not involved in maintaining any index and does not act as an index provider.Shariah screening of the index components is undertaken by Shariah consultants Yasaar Limited, whose scholars represent all of the major Shariah schools of thought. The index is certified Shariah-compliant through a Fatwa issued by Yasaar's principals.
Expense ratio0.45%0.50%
Inception17 Dec 201916 Jul 2019
ExchangeNYSE Arca, Inc.The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
DomicileUnited StatesUnited States
Distribution frequencyMonthlyAnnual
Annualized return since inception (third-party)18.27%16.97%
In this comparison
Screening and index methodologyHoldings (separate dated lists)Fees and practical costsPerformance figures and their limitationsDistribution policy differenceResearch checklist

Screening and index methodology

SPUS and HLAL start from different index families. SPUS tracks the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, administered by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and co-developed with the fund's sub-adviser ShariaPortfolio, with Raqaba LLC acting as Sharia adviser to ShariaPortfolio. HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index, administered by FTSE International Limited, whose components are screened by Shariah consultants Yasaar Limited. Both apply rules-based screens that exclude prohibited business activities and excessive leverage, but the index, the administrator and the screening consultant are different, so the two funds can hold different stocks.

Holdings (separate dated lists)

Both providers publish dated holdings lists. They are shown here only as references to each fund's own official document — this page does not merge them or produce a holdings-overlap percentage, because the two lists use different index universes and reporting dates. Always read each list with its own effective date.

Fees and practical costs

SPUS reports an expense ratio of 0.45% and HLAL reports 0.50%. Both trade on US exchanges (SPUS on NYSE Arca, HLAL on NASDAQ), so a GCC investor pays brokerage, currency-conversion and settlement costs on top of the fund's own expense ratio. Those platform costs are not part of either fund's expense ratio.

Performance figures and their limitations

The annualized since-inception returns shown in the table are third-party data from the calculator's public snapshot, not official provider NAV returns, and each carries its own reporting date. SPUS incepted in December 2019 and HLAL in July 2019, so their figures cover different windows and are not a like-for-like comparison.

Distribution policy difference

SPUS distributes monthly, while HLAL's fund page lists an annual distribution. Wahed's prospectus and Statement of Additional Information describe HLAL dividends as declared and paid at least annually, so the fund page and the fund's own documents use different wording — the difference is recorded here rather than silently normalised.

Research checklist

Before choosing, confirm on each provider's current documents: the benchmark and index administrator, the screening consultant, the expense ratio, the inception date, the distribution frequency, and the holdings list with its effective date. Then decide which index and provider approach you prefer — this page does not declare a winner.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, SPUS or HLAL?

This page does not rank them. They track different indexes (S&P versus FTSE) with different administrators and screening consultants, so the better fit depends on which index and provider you prefer after reading both providers' documents.

Are SPUS and HLAL both US equity funds?

Yes. Both provide Shariah-screened exposure to US equities, but through different index methodologies and providers.

Why do their returns look different?

Their returns are measured over different inception windows (HLAL from July 2019, SPUS from December 2019) and they follow different indexes, so the figures are not directly comparable.

Which index does each fund track?

SPUS tracks the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index; HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index.

Sources

SP Funds — SPUS fund page and fund details tableSP Funds Prospectus dated March 28, 2025 (SPUS, SPSK, SPRE), as supplemented June 3, 2025Wahed — Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) fund pageWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF factsheet, dated as of June 30, 2026Wahed ETFs Prospectus dated September 30, 2025 (HLAL, UMMA)

Related research

This comparison is educational content, not financial, tax or Shariah advice, and it does not recommend one fund over another. Shariah screening is attributed to each fund's provider and is not independently certified here. Annualized returns are third-party data, not official provider NAV returns, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify every figure against the fund's current documents before acting. To report an error, use the contact page.